Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
J Nurs Adm ; 53(2): 88-95, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2230688

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Innovation is needed to solve nursing workforce issues during times of crisis. A collaborative effort between a hospital system and several universities resulted in the Bridge to Professional Practice Program that was implemented during a period of high patient volume and nursing student downtime. The program provided support for staffing needs and clinical hours to promote readiness for practice for students. The program evaluation outcomes and recommendations for improvement are addressed.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Hospitals , Interinstitutional Relations , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Humans , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/organization & administration , Students, Nursing , Health Workforce , Organizational Innovation , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Nursing Evaluation Research
7.
J Nurs Adm ; 51(3): E6-E12, 2021 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1078886

ABSTRACT

This article discusses the crucial role and dearth of critical care nurses in the United States highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. This challenge of sufficient critical care nursing resources existed before the pandemic, but now concern is heightened by the need for such crucial healthcare providers now and in the future. We present strategies to address the gap, as well as challenges inherent in the suggested approaches. The discussion is relevant as nurse leaders adapt to COVID-19 and other novel challenges in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/nursing , Critical Care Nursing/standards , Critical Care Nursing/trends , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Critical Care Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
9.
J Nurs Adm ; 51(2): E1-E5, 2021 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066481

ABSTRACT

AIM: To identify strategies that increase hospital bed capacity, material resources, and available nurse staffing during a national pandemic. BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak resulted in an influx of acutely ill patients requiring critical care. The volume and acuity of this patient population increased the demand for care and stretched hospitals beyond their capacity. While increasing hospital bed capacity and material resources are crucial, healthcare systems have noted one of the greatest limitations to rapid expansion has been the number of available medical personnel, particularly those trained in emergency and critical care nursing. EVALUATION: Program evaluation occurred on a daily basis with hospital throughput, focusing on logistics including our ability to expand bed volume, resource utilization, and the ability to meet staffing needs. CONCLUSION: This article describes how a quaternary care hospital in New York City prepared for the COVID-19 surge in patients by maximizing and shifting nursing resources to its most impacted services, the emergency department (ED) and the intensive care units (ICUs). A tier-based staffing model and rapid training were operationalized to address nurse-staffing shortages in the ICU and ED, identifying key factors for swift deployment. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGERS: Frequent communication between staff and leaders improves teamwork and builds trust and buy-in during normal operations and particularly in times of crisis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/nursing , Critical Care/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Hospital Bed Capacity , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
10.
Am J Nurs ; 120(12): 46-47, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-995719
13.
Med Leg J ; 88(2): 57-64, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-591486

ABSTRACT

This is a personal view from London as the Covid-19 pandemic continues to spread here and the situation changes from day to day. As such it can only be a snapshot caught in time; it is not a diary of events. The Coronavirus Act 2020 gives Government enormous powers and was passed by Parliament in one day of debate immediately before it closed early for the Easter break. In March, the government imposed a "lockdown: the closure of all" but "essential" businesses and people other than essential workers must work from home but are allowed out for exercise and food shopping but must maintain 2 m apart, the "social distancing rule". The aim is to suppress the spread of the virus, reduce the death toll and "protect the National Health Service (NHS)" which needed time to empty wards and expand its intensive care unit (ICU) capability to deal with an expected influx of thousands of very sick patients. I discuss whether this strategy is working, how and why it has rapidly been altered to respond to criticism. Why was the Government so slow to seek the help of private laboratories to assist with testing? Why was the personal protective equipment (PPE) guidance altered only after criticism? I look at the impact of the lockdown on the UK economy, the changes to practice of medicine and speeding of scientific research. Cooperating with the lockdown has its price; is it harming the health and mental health of children, people living in households with potentially abusive partners or parents and those who are disabled or financially desperate? Is the cure worse than the disease? The Economy is being devastated by the lockdown and each day of lockdown it is worse. Is litigation being seeded even now by the pandemic? Notwithstanding unprecedented Government financial help many businesses are on the edge of collapse, people will lose their jobs and pensioners income. The winners include pharmacies, supermarkets, online food retailers, Amazon, online apps, providers of video games, services, streaming and scientific research laboratories, manufacturers of testing kits, ventilators, hand sanitisers, coffins, undertakers, etc. The British public is cooperating with lockdown but are we less productive at home? Parents with babies and children often child minders, school, grandparents or paid help which is not now available. Will current reliance on video-conferencing and video calls permanently change the way we work and will we need smaller city offices? Will we travel less? Will medical and legal practice and civil and criminal trials be generally carried out remotely? Will social distancing with self-isolation and job losses and business failures fuel depression? Is Covid-19 comparable to past epidemics like the Plague and Spanish flu?


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Communicable Disease Control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Criminal Law , Depression/epidemiology , Economics , Forecasting , Freedom , Government Regulation , Housing/economics , Humans , Internet , London/epidemiology , Medical Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Pandemics , Panic , Personal Autonomy , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Public Health Administration , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Schools , Social Control Policies , Social Isolation , Telemedicine , Travel , Triage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL